
I'm currently considering a blanket laying strategy as an exercise to gauge the profitability of laying activity on the exchanges.
I don't know whether to lay every fav for a maximum liability of 1 point, or lay each fav for a stake of 1 point.
I'll have to run a few simulations.
I don't want to get into a situation of laying too many longer priced horses even if they are favs. I would prefer lays to be in the range of evens to 3/1.
I think there is generally a bigger over-round built into shorter SP favs. I also think the term ‘blanket’ laying implies that it is pretty arbitrary, but over time I expect revisions and tweaks to refine the approach, possibly into exclusively handicaps, certain distances, race types etc
I had a quick look at results last week, and played the lays game for real myself on Tuesday, picking all overnight favs that fit the range. There were only 3 in markets that were mature, & I laid them all to 1 point stake by the backer.
All three lost, for a profit of 3 points
On the second day I laid three horses in this category, and all three won, at evens, 6/4 and 7/4. I had put in a lay on another but it didn't get matched, at 2/1, and that won too.
Out of interest the 6/4 horse was matched at 55 in running for £400 so a good result all round for backers there.
My loss on Day 2 was 4.25 points.
On day 2 I could have laid more but I tried to get a bit too clever and decided to stay away from one of the day meetings where there were a lot of qualifying favs and instead went for an evening card where the favs looked a bit less solid. This backfired as the afternoon jollies were all sunk and the evening ones all won.
I think I have to stay away from this line in the future, and just let the results take care of themselves.
As it is a fact as certain as night follows day, that bets on SP favs will always return a loss, it stands to reason that this will make money.
The judgement will remain as to what lay price will constitute an SP return, and when making an instruction for a lay where markets are immature, this will still require a little bit of judgement to avoid offering backers excessive value.
Another advantage of blanket laying without exceptions is that it is less time consuming than a detailed evaluation of every race which could end up taking a full days work.
As it stands I doubt William Hill’s are quaking in their boots, but stay with me, there may be gold in this yet.
-------------------------------------
I see the Racing Post are making some changes to their website which is currently a complete dog's breakfast since the move to racingpost.com
Personally I only use about a quarter of the screen as the only features I am interested in are the news and racecard features, which are surrounded by pointless video clips that don't work, adverts and a lot of general irrelevant rubbish.
Whoever paid to have this redesigned needs their head examining, but with £1.80 prices per paper copy and circulation falling through the floor I guess this is pretty typical of the Post's backward progress in recent years.
It looks as though they are finally getting round to charging for some site features. I guess this had to come but even so it will be a disappointing day for racing fans.
I think we may look back to the era of the early 2000s as a golden era for racing fans.
We had tax free betting, great sign up bonuses, free coverage of every race on Attheraces satellite channel, free access to form and analysis on Racing post site.
In 2009 we now face a £20 per month charge to watch half the UK racing on Racing UK, membership fees on the RacingPost site, and reduced sign up promos.
Still, its miles better than 15 years ago when we had betting tax on all bets, a few races on terrestrial TV every now and again, and comparing the odds meant walking next from one shop to another, so let's not get too despondent about the state of play.





